...20'22/193

Both the author in the reading passage and the lecturer in the lecturer talk about the fossil of a dinosaur. Yet their viewpoints contrast with each other. While the author mentions that the fossil shows the remains of blood vessels, red blood cells, and collagen matrix in the actual tissues of animal which is 70-million-year-old, the lecturer thinks otherwise, contending that it is not possible to find them.

 

First of all, while the writer states that the breaking of the fossilized leg bone revealed many small branching channel inside, corresponding to hollows in the bones where blood vessels were once located, the speaker presents opposing discourse to such a belief, reasoning that instead of blood vessels, they are actually the bacteria inside the bones.

 

Second, as opposed to the conviction presented in the reading passage, the speaker argues that there is no cells in the primitive dinosaur body at all, therefore, they may probably be the radish mineral. 

 

Third, presented in the lecture to diminish the authenticity in the reading passage is that the collagen only can be found up to 100 thousand years ago. Since the fossil is 70-million-year-old, it is definitely contradict. 

 

arrow
arrow
    全站熱搜

    tina 發表在 痞客邦 留言(0) 人氣()